ShedBoxAI vs Prefect
Prefect modernized workflow orchestration with Python decorators. ShedBoxAI takes it further with pure YAML configuration.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | ShedBoxAI | Prefect |
|---|---|---|
| Configuration | YAML | Python with decorators |
| Setup | Single pip install | Cloud account or server |
| Pricing | Free & open source | Free tier + paid cloud |
| AI Integration | Built-in | Requires custom tasks |
| Learning Curve | Minutes | Hours |
| Best For | All team sizes | Teams with Python skills |
Key Differences
1. Configuration Approach
Prefect uses Python decorators to define flows:
from prefect import flow, task
@task
def extract():
return load_data()
@task
def transform(data):
return process(data)
@flow
def my_pipeline():
data = extract()
result = transform(data)
return result
ShedBoxAI uses declarative YAML:
data_sources:
raw_data:
type: csv
path: "data.csv"
processing:
contextual_filtering:
raw_data:
- field: "status"
condition: "active"
new_name: "active_records"
output:
type: file
path: "processed.json"
format: json
2. Cloud Dependency
Prefect Cloud provides a UI and scheduling, but requires account setup and network connectivity. ShedBoxAI runs entirely locally.
3. AI-First Design
ShedBoxAI includes native AI model integration:
ai_interface:
model:
type: rest
url: "https://api.anthropic.com/v1/messages"
method: POST
headers:
x-api-key: "${ANTHROPIC_API_KEY}"
Content-Type: "application/json"
options:
model: "claude-sonnet-4-20250514"
prompts:
insights:
user_template: |
Summarize this data:
{{ data | tojson }}
Prefect requires custom task implementations for AI processing.
When to Choose Prefect
- You want a visual UI for flow monitoring
- Your team is comfortable with Python
- You need Prefect Cloud's scheduling features
- You're already using Prefect
When to Choose ShedBoxAI
- You prefer configuration over code
- You need built-in AI integration
- You want to run everything locally
- You need a simpler learning curve