ShedBoxAI vs Luigi
Luigi, created by Spotify, pioneered Python-based data pipelines. ShedBoxAI offers a modern, YAML-based alternative.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | ShedBoxAI | Luigi |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 2024 | 2012 |
| Configuration | YAML | Python classes |
| Dependencies | Minimal | Complex setup |
| AI Integration | Built-in | None |
| Maintenance | Active | Limited updates |
| Learning Curve | Minutes | Days |
Key Differences
Class-Based vs YAML
Luigi uses Python classes for tasks:
import luigi
class ProcessData(luigi.Task):
def requires(self):
return ExtractData()
def output(self):
return luigi.LocalTarget('output.csv')
def run(self):
# Processing logic
pass
ShedBoxAI uses simple YAML:
data_sources:
input:
type: csv
path: "input.csv"
processing:
contextual_filtering:
input:
- field: "active"
condition: "true"
new_name: "active_records"
output:
type: file
path: "output.json"
format: json
Modern AI Integration
Luigi predates the AI era and has no built-in LLM support. ShedBoxAI was built for AI-first workflows:
ai_interface:
model:
type: rest
url: "https://api.anthropic.com/v1/messages"
method: POST
headers:
x-api-key: "${ANTHROPIC_API_KEY}"
Content-Type: "application/json"
options:
model: "claude-sonnet-4-20250514"
prompts:
analysis:
user_template: |
Analyze this data:
{{ data | tojson }}
When to Choose Luigi
- You have existing Luigi pipelines to maintain
- You need Luigi's central scheduler
- Your team is familiar with Luigi patterns
When to Choose ShedBoxAI
- You're starting fresh with data pipelines
- You want built-in AI capabilities
- You prefer modern, actively maintained tools
- You want faster development cycles